“Thank you very much for this informative
post,” the spambot says. “It has been very beneficial to my study of glow
worms.” Fantastic, you say, but my piece was on a recent media scandal, not
fluorescent grubs.
Obviously, this kind of post is easy to spot. Even in heated conversations in comment sections it’s easy to spot a troll. Astroturfing, however, is sneakier. It’s as pervasive and needy as spam, and as infuriating as a troll.
Obviously, this kind of post is easy to spot. Even in heated conversations in comment sections it’s easy to spot a troll. Astroturfing, however, is sneakier. It’s as pervasive and needy as spam, and as infuriating as a troll.
On the spectrum of spam to troll, the astroturfer
sits closer to the spam bot, and a lot of that is owing to the fact that
astroturfing has more to do with pretending to be a real poster than pretending
to have a real agenda.
Astroturfing
is more intelligent, more strategic, and more authentic looking than any other
kind of spam and therefore much more likely to convince regular contributors,
or as HappyRockefeller from the Daily Kos says, ‘give the illusion of consensus’,
which is a dangerous thing in the democratic online society we’re pleased as
punch to inhabit.
So how
do we know who’s authentic, and who’s the vehicle of a PR strategy? There are
plenty of tips available on the internet for spotting astroturfers which mainly
look at the credible infrastructure associated with online identities, such as
IP address, a website history, and other postings.
The
practice of maintaining these inauthentic screennames is called Persona Management. It’s is interesting because it brings
the robot and the real together. Software algorithms are responsible for maintaining
an authentic looking online personality. A company that has erupted out of
nowhere, or a blogger commenting on a post with no prior activity is bound to
be suspicious, but a person with a history of engagement with a topic appears a
little more credible. By creating all of the ‘online furniture’, as dmdyslin says, it results in no one suspecting ‘that they came onto the scene for the
first time a moment ago for the sole purpose of attacking an article’.
Up to
10 “pre-aged” accounts are created at once, and are then supported by a series
of flexible and static IP addresses which stop websites recognising the fake
users, but then add legitimacy to their account over time so that it recognises
the same user posting after the initial flood of activity.
So how
are you supposed to figure out what’s fake when all signals point to
authenticity?
It is possible to figure out whether multiple entries are from the same user. Thisis a useful site that blogger Sandi Keane suggests an alternate way to spotting astroturfing. She examines the semantics of the language used by the posters, noting several keywords like ‘incorporated’ and different phrases that hail nationalists, that ‘follow a pattern in the way they manipulate triggers in the mind to evoke a psychological response.’
It is possible to figure out whether multiple entries are from the same user. Thisis a useful site that blogger Sandi Keane suggests an alternate way to spotting astroturfing. She examines the semantics of the language used by the posters, noting several keywords like ‘incorporated’ and different phrases that hail nationalists, that ‘follow a pattern in the way they manipulate triggers in the mind to evoke a psychological response.’
Hailing
the individual is much more of an active marketing approach, and sometimes the
effort to promote a product or agenda is much more noticeable. Persona
Management is one of the smoother astroturfing tactics. There are some interestingstories of people being caught out by using their personal accounts,
which were tracked back to their company – the competitor of the company they
were astroturfing.
I did
find, in my hunt for information on how to spot astroturfing, a <a href=" http://astroturfingevidence.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">suspicious
looking blog</a>. On this suspicious looking blog was one blog post, no
user information, no other posts and no activity log. This blog had been
created for the purpose of ‘outing’ a website <a href="www.fiverr.com">Fiverr</a>.
Fiverr is a website run to connect businesses with individuals who will
‘support’ them, all for $5 US. The author of the blog was definitely on to
something:
<blockquote> I could tell from the guys eyes and his body
language that what he was saying was a complete lie. Then something clicked – I
remembered a site I was surfing on a few weeks back, where people would do
almost anything for five dollars and I had seen a few advertisments about
people making testimonial videos – I went to the site www.fiverr.com and
searched for ‘video testimonial’ – I found the guy who made the video in an
instant !
http://fiverr.com/russellwilliams/provide-a-video-testimonial-for-your-product-or-service
You can see the original video as
above – or heres my copy below just incase the original gets removed because we
are onto him.</blockquote>
But the blog itself is incredibly
suspicious, almost as if it was created simply for promoting Fiverr.com. Hmm.
On the spam – troll spectrum, this Wordpress and Fiverr sit way over on the
canned-ham end.
When it
comes to astroturfing yourself, you might want to consider what methods you
use, as we will when the website is created. You could choose to stick with
Social Media Management or Search Engine Optimisation, but be aware there are
other options out there.
Similarly,
when it comes to dealing with the comments posted on your site, be aware that
some of them still may not be real individuals. You should always keep in mind
that users on the internet may not be who they say they are, but when it comes
to this stuff – well, they might not even be human.
No comments:
Post a Comment